| 72 | 0 | 47 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
对铸造及锻制高锰钢试件开展爆炸硬化试验,分析爆炸硬化后其硬度、拉伸、冲击性能及显微组织的变化规律,并从爆炸硬化机理角度分析产生性能变化的原因。结果表明:仅对轨头顶面进行爆炸可获得较高的浅表硬度,但硬化层深度有限;引入侧面爆炸可减小硬度梯度,形成稳定的中心高硬度带。高锰钢硬化特征受原始组织和断面尺寸的影响显著,相同条件下,铸造高锰钢硬化深度大,易实现全断面硬化;而锻制高锰钢硬化深度浅,易获得较高的浅表硬度。相比于大断面,小断面的硬化效果强且范围广。爆炸引起硬化区域屈服强度升高及塑性、韧性小幅下降。变形带的形态及分布变化是引起炸后性能变化的主要原因。
Abstract:Explosion hardening experiments were carried out on cast and forged high-manganese steel specimens. The variation laws of hardness, tensile properties, impact properties and microstructure of high manganese steel after explosive hardening were systematically analyzed, and the intrinsic causes of performance evolution were revealed from the perspective of explosive hardening mechanism. The results indicate that only subjecting the rail head's top surface to explosion hardening can obtain high superficial hardness, but results in a limited hardening depth. Furthermore, introducing explosions on the rail head sides reduces the hardness gradient and forms a stable central high-hardness zone. The explosion hardening behavior of high-manganese steel is significantly influenced by its microstructure and cross-sectional dimensions. The cast high-manganese steel achieves a greater hardening depth and full-section hardening, whereas the forged high-manganese steel attains a shallower depth but higher superficial hardness under identical explosion conditions. The smaller cross-sections exhibit more pronounced and extensive explosive hardening effects compared to the larger rail cross-sections. In addition, explosion hardening leads to an increase in yield strength and a decrease in plasticity and toughness in the hardened areas. Microstructural observations reveal that the distribution density of deformation bands are the primary reasons for the property changes in the exploded regions.
[1] 胡晓艳.高锰钢爆炸硬化专用炸药与硬化机理的研究[D].合肥:中国科学技术大学,2014:1-2.
[2] 张观军.高锰钢爆炸硬化性能及硬化机理[D].洛阳:河南科技大学,2007: 16-42.
[3] 谢利鹏,贾宏选,刘波,等.不同粒度黑索今对爆炸硬化用橡胶炸药性能的影响[C]//第十六届中国科协年会第九分会场:含能材料及绿色民爆产业发展论坛论文集,2014:44-46.
[4] 陈兴,李如江,李焕芝,等.爆炸硬化用塑性炸药的研究及其应用[J].化工中间体,2014,10(10): 26-29.
[5] 崔宇琳,丁志敏,苏冬雪,等.爆炸硬化的110Mn13钢高接触应力下的初期耐磨性[J].大连交通大学学报, 2021,42(2):82-86.
[6] 巴奇楠,宋仁伯,冯一帆,等.表面爆炸处理后的ZGMn13Cr2钢的冲击磨损性能及硬化机理[J].材料导报, 2019,33(10):1712-1716.
[7] 张福成,吕博,刘辉,等.爆炸硬化ZGMn13Cu2NV钢辙叉的组织和性能[J].机械工程学报,2008,44(6):131-136.
[8] 鹿广清.爆炸硬化高锰钢组合辙叉水平裂纹伤损分析[J].铁道标准设计,2019,63(12):43-48.
[9] 陈宝功,刘培荣.爆炸硬化对高锰钢辙叉使用寿命的影响[J].冶金设备,2013(增刊1):131-132.
[10] 张福成.铁路轨道用钢:创新与实践[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2022:8-207.
[11] 董林楠.120Mn13钢的塑性变形行为及其微观结构演化过程的研究[D].大连:大连交通大学,2024: 54-114.
[12] 于明超.冲击波加载工业纯铁内部的微观结构研究[D].北京:北京工业大学,2022: 77-88.
[13] 王刚,汪小锋,刘先斌,等.晶粒尺寸和应变量对高纯铝表面橘皮效应的影响规律[J].材料科学与工艺,2022,30(2):51-60.
[14] 孙芳芳.2219铝合金拉伸成型过程中表面橘皮现象研究[D].天津:天津大学,2014: 7-12.
基本信息:
中图分类号:TG142.1
引用信息:
[1]闫维文,尉小明,畅国纪.爆炸硬化对辙叉用铸造及锻制高锰钢组织性能的影响[J].铁道建筑().
基金信息:
铁科(北京)轨道装备技术有限公司创新项目(KY2025-013)
2026-05-08
2026-05-08
2026-05-08