nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 09, v.65 15-19
重载铁路轨道几何质量劣化规律
基金项目(Foundation): 国能朔黄铁路发展有限责任公司科技创新项目(SHTL-23-24)
邮箱(Email): along599@163.com;
DOI:
摘要:

基于国内某典型重载铁路2021—2023年周期性轨道几何检测数据,结合线路通过总质量、捣固清筛等运维信息,研究重载铁路轨道质量典型劣化规律,对比分析重载铁路轨道几何劣化速率在路基直线、路基曲线、桥梁、隧道等不同线路基础类型下的分布特征,为重载铁路轨道管理、养修计划制订等提供依据。结果表明:轨道质量在捣固周期内的劣化趋势可归为平稳发展和自然劣化两种典型模式,其占比分别约为15%和85%;在所有线路基础类型中,路基直线区段劣化速率最小,桥梁区段劣化速率最大;高低单项在轨道质量劣化中贡献最大,其标准差劣化速率平均值约为轨向、轨距的2~4倍。

Abstract:

Based on the periodic track geometry detection data of a typical heavy haul railway in China from 2021 to 2023, combined with operation and maintenance information such as total passing weight, compaction and screening of the line, this study investigated the typical degradation law of heavy haul railway track quality, compared and analyzed the distribution characteristics of the geometric degradation rate of heavy haul railway track under different types of line foundations such as subgrade straight lines, subgrade curves, bridges, tunnels, etc., providing a basis for heavy haul railway track management and maintenance plan formulation. The results show that the degradation trend of track quality during the compaction cycle can be classified into two typical modes, which are steady development and natural degradation, accounting for about 15% and 85% respectively. Among all types of line foundations, the degradation rate of the subgrade straight section is the lowest, and the degradation rate of the bridge section is the highest. High and low single items contribute the most to the degradation of track quality, and an average standard deviation degradation rate of them is about 2~4 times that of track orientation and track gauge.

参考文献

[1]中国铁路总公司.普速铁路线路修理规则:TG/GW 102—2019[M].北京:中国铁道出版社有限公司,2019.

[2]JOVANOVIC S, ESVELD C. Ecotrack:an Objective Condition-based Decision Support System for Long-term Track M&R Planning Directed Towards Reduction of Life Cycle Costs[C]//International Union of Railways.Proceedings of the 7th International Heavy Haul Conference.Brisbane:UIC,2001:249-266.

[3]罗林,张格明,吴旺青,等.轮轨系统轨道平顺状态的控制[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2006.

[4]ESVELD C. Modern Railway Track[M]. Zaltbommel:MRT Productions,2001.

[5]许玉德,吴纪才.利用线性预测模型分析轨道不平顺发展[J].石家庄铁道学院学报,2005,18(1):6-9.

[6]许玉德,刘一鸣,沈坚锋.轨道不平顺预测随机模型的SVM-MC求解方法[J].华东交通大学学报,2018,35(3):1-7.

[7]杨飞.基于高低不平顺的线路捣固作业维修标准及决策技术研究[J].铁道建筑,2017,57(7):131-135.

[8]龙亦语.基于轨道检测数据的朔黄铁路大机捣固作业评估与经济维修决策方法[D].北京:中国铁道科学研究院,2022.

[9]曲建军.基于提速线路TQI的轨道不平顺预测与辅助决策技术的研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2010.

[10]杨文,曲建军,龙亦语,等.朔黄铁路轨道质量分级管理标准研究[J].铁道建筑,2022,62(2):25-28.

基本信息:

DOI:

中图分类号:U239.4;U216

引用信息:

[1]何占元,龙亦语,刘攀.重载铁路轨道几何质量劣化规律[J].铁道建筑,2025,65(09):15-19.

基金信息:

国能朔黄铁路发展有限责任公司科技创新项目(SHTL-23-24)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文